ON THIS PAGE

Examining Relationships Among Sexual Self-Schemas, Attachment Dimensions in Close Relationships, and Sexual Compulsivity Among Young Adults

Furkan Kekli̇k1, Hanife Akgül2
1Expert Psychological Counsellor, Çanakkale, Türkiye
2Department of Guidance and Psychological Counselling, Educational Sciences, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Çanakkale, Türkiye

Abstract

This study investigated associations among sexual self-schemas, attachment-related anxiety and avoidance in close relationships, and sexual compulsivity among young adults. The main study variables were sexual self-schemas, attachment dimensions, and sexual compulsivity, with particular attention to relationships among their respective subscales. A correlational survey design was employed. Data were initially collected from 503 participants; responses from 20 individuals were subsequently excluded following outlier screening, resulting in a final analytical sample of 483 participants. The Sexual Self-Schema Scale (SSSS), Experiences in Close Relationships Scale–Revised (ECR-II), and Sexual Compulsivity Scale (SCS) were administered as data collection instruments. Analyses were conducted using SPSS version 29. After evaluating the distributions of the scale scores, Pearson correlation analyses and multiple linear regression analysis were performed. Results indicated negative associations between sexual self-schema scores and attachment-related anxiety and avoidance, as well as small positive associations between sexual self-schema scores and sexual compulsivity. Attachment-related anxiety was positively related to sexual compulsivity, whereas avoidance was not significantly related to the SCS outcomes. In particular, the sensual/stimulating dimension of the SSSS and the anxiety dimension of the ECR-II were significant positive predictors of total SCS scores in the multiple regression model. Together, these two dimensions accounted for approximately 11.2% of the variance in sexual compulsivity scores (adjusted R\(^2\) = .108). The findings describe statistical associations within a cross-sectional sample and do not establish causal relationships.

Related Articles
Iryna Forkun1, Yurii Radionov2, Nina Petrukha Nina Petrukha3, Serhii Petrukha4, Oleksandr Zinevych5
1Department of Finance, Banking, Insurance and Stock Market, Faculty of Economics and Management, Khmelnytskyi National University, Khmelnytskyi, Ukraine
2Department of Financial, Credit and Tax Policy, National Scientific Centre “Institute of Agrarian Economics”, Kyiv, Ukraine
3Department of Management in Construction, Kyiv National University of Construction and Architecture, Kyiv, Ukraine
4Department of Transport and Logistics, West Ukrainian National University, Ternopil, Ukraine
5Interregional Academy of Personnel Management, Kyiv, Ukraine
Jiayu Sun1, Guan Yang2, Zhenguo Cao3, Wei Zhao4
1School of Economics, Guangzhou College of Commerce, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 511363, China
2School of Business, Guangzhou College of Technology and Business, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510850, China
3School of Educational Science and Technology, Guangzhou College of Technology and Business, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 528138, China
4School of Digital Economy Industry, Guangzhou College of Commerce, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 511363, China
Ravi Dubey1, Arpit Sharma2, Sharad Kumar Pandey3
1Advocate, Maahir Associates–Legal Solution, Lucknow, India
2School of Law, Forensic Justice and Policy Studies, National Forensic Sciences University, Delhi Campus, India
3Symbiosis Law School, Noida Campus, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune, India
Da Li1, Jing Zhou2, Qiyan Tan1
1School of Arts, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330027, China
2School of Music, Jiangxi Science and Technology Normal University, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330038, China

Citation

Furkan Kekli̇k, Hanife Akgül. Examining Relationships Among Sexual Self-Schemas, Attachment Dimensions in Close Relationships, and Sexual Compulsivity Among Young Adults[J], Archives Des Sciences, Volume 76, Issue 4, 2026. 107-117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.68304/as/76411.