Search
Close this search box.

ON THIS PAGE

Numerical Descriptors of Top Ranked Zinc Databased Inhibitors of Sars Cov-2

M.C. Shanmukha1, A. Usha2, Mohammad Reza Farahani3, Mehdi Alaeiyan4, Murat Cancan5
1Department of Mathematics, P.E.S. Institute of Technology and Management, Shivamogga-577204, India.
2Department of Mathematics, Alliance School of Applied Mathematics, Alliance University, Bangalore-562106, India.
3Department of Mathematics, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran 16844, Iran.
4School of Mathematics and Computer Science, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran 16844, Iran.
5Faculty of Education, Van Yuzuncu Yil University, Zeve Campus 6500, Van, Turkey.

Abstract

From the year 2019, the pandemic has been a threat to mankind and the entire world is behind the making of the SARS-COV-2 vaccine. This work attempts to find various topological indices such as ABC(G), χ(G), S(G), GA(G), M1(G), M2(G), H(G), ZG3(G), SSD(G), I(G), A(G), mM2(G) for top ranked Zinc databased molecules of SARS-COV-2 inhibitors as per ChemAI. ChemAI is a network where chemistry uses artificial intelligence to test various chemicals using the Turing test. A conclusion is drawn for the Zinc databased molecules with respect to physical property, logP to understand Lipophilicity since, if any of the variants like Covid comes, Zinc databased molecules alone and also in combination are the main supplements required as a preliminary for all human beings.

1. Introduction

The main threat of current situation globally is the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-COV-2) is caused by novel coronavirus which needs immediate therapies and novel drugs to fight against the virus and its infections. Although the study of SARS-COV-2 is in progress, SARS-COV-2 affected persons are experiencing symptoms of the novel coronavirus- fever, sore throat, loss of smell and taste, fatigue, lower respiratory infection. These symptoms may be mild in few people and may continue to deteriorate which can result in fatality in the cases where the patient has other complications such as diabetes, cancer, high blood pressure and heart ailments. Also, in few cases, the virus becomes dangerous for senior citizens aged above 65 years because of lack of immunity caused from the long term ailments such as diabetes and heart related issues.

The treatment of the patients includes supportive treatment like treating the specific problem, antiviral treatment and oxygen therapy by oxygen support. Apart from this, there are other traditional therapies using Ayurveda where natural ingredients like spices and herbs are used. The other treatments is plasma therapy where the antibodies of Covid-19 recovered person will be injected in to the virus affected patient. A few cases have been successful so far but many cases drastically failed where the patient has succumbed to death after the plasma therapy. As the exact drug is yet to be invented, the above are the therapies available at the moment. The whole world is struggling to find a vaccine/drug to fight against the dangerous virus, which was initially spotted in humans in Wuhan city, China in December, 2019.

As it spreads rapidly, the people are educated about the virus symptoms and the consequences of infections so that the people take enough precautions such as wearing face masks and frequent usage of sanitizer to avoid the spread of the dreadful virus.

“ChemAI” is a neural network, in other words, where chemistry uses artificial intelligence to predict a large number of biological effects of the chemical compounds. In detail, the network is tested on a data set available on ZINC [1], pubchem [2] and many such databases. Here, ZINC database is used as it has large data of molecules. In this study, a set of top ranked molecules are considered for which topological indices are determined. Also, the physical property, logP of these molecules are correlated with the degree based topological indices. Conclusions are drawn with regard to the correlation coefficient.

In theoretical chemistry, chemical compounds are represented as molecular graphs with vertex and edge, such that vertex depicts an atom and edge depicts link between the two atoms. Let \(G(V,E)\) be a molecular graph with vertices and edges respectively. Here degree of a vertex is \(d_{s}\) of vertices \(s\) in \(G\). In this work the graphs considered are simple graphs with no cycles and multiple edges [3-5].

In this paper, a large number of molecules were considered for inference with ChemAI [6] to obtain predictions against the SARS-COV-2 (COVID-19) virus. In the cited paper, the construction of screening library of potential inhibitors of SARS-COV-2 molecules were considered. The same strong inhibitors of SARS-COV-2 are studied here for QSPR analysis [7-12] . Degree-based topological indices are determined and tabulated. The degree of correlation coefficient is determined with each of the degree-based topological indices with respect to physical property, logP of these inhibitors.

logP is extensively used in drug discovery/drug design as logP gives the clear picture of the biological activities of the drug molecules in the body. Lipophilicity is the critical parameter of a drug which defines the biological and metabolic activities. It is a significant parameter to define toxicity of a drug.

logP being the partition coefficient, not only predicts how the compound acts inside the body but also gives the information about formulation, dosing and toxicity of the drug.

In the literature various topological indices are discussed for various drugs used in the treatment of Covid-19 [13-16].

2. Materials and Methods

The materials used for this work are [17,18] and the molecules, which are considered for this study are the top ranked SARS-COV-2 inhibitors with reference to ChemAI using Zinc database provided by Sterling and Irwin in 2015 [1]. In ordered to find the topological indices of 17 top ranked SARS-COV-2 inhibitors, each molecule is considered as a graph. The links between the atoms are regarded as edges and the atoms of each link are considered as vertices of that molecule [19-22]. The degree of every vertex and the types of edges are studied for each molecule.

This data is clearly explained in the Theorem III for the molecule \(ZINC000254565785\). Topological index is a numerical measure which flows a specific rule. The complete information of the types of edges are used in the definitions of 12 degree-based topological indices to obtain the results. Similarly, for the other 16 molecules also, the above procedure is repeated. Every molecule has the set of bivariate data namely topological indices and partition coefficient logP. Karl Pearson’s coefficient of correlation is determined for this bivariate data using any one of the following tools, Microsoft Excel, Origin and SPSS.

Definition 1. Degree-based topological index \(ABC\) was introduced by Estrada et al., [23] as \[ABC(G)=\sum_{e=st\in E(G)}\sqrt{\frac{d_{s}+d_{t}-2}{d_{s} d_{t}}}. \label{eq-1}\tag{1}\]

Definition 2. Milan Randic defined Randic index [24] as \[\chi(G)=\sum_{e=st\in E(G)}\frac{1}{\sqrt{d_{s} d_{t}}} \label{eq-2}\tag{2}\]

Definition 3. Zhou et al., [25] proposed the sum-connectivity index and is defined as \[S(G)=\sum_{e=st\in E(G)}\frac{1}{\sqrt{d_{s} +d_{t}}}. \label{eq-3}\tag{3}\]

Definition 4. Vukicevic et al., [26] proposed the GA index as \[GA(G)=\sum_{e=st\in E(G)}\frac{2\sqrt{d_{s} d_{t}}}{d_{s} + d_{t}}. \label{eq-4}\tag{4}\]

Definition 5. Gutman et al., [27] proposed the first and second Zagreb indices as \[ M_1(G)=\sum_{e=st\in E(G)}(d_{s} + d_{t}).\tag{5}\] \[ M_2(G)=\sum_{e=st\in E(G)}(d_{s}\cdot d_{t}). \label{eq-6}\tag{6}\]

Definition 6. Harmonic index is proposed by Fajtlowicz [28] as, \[H(G)=\sum_{e=st\in E(G)}\frac{2}{d_{s}+d_{t}}. \label{eq-7}\tag{7}\]

Definition 7. The third Zagreb index is proposed by Fath-Tabar et al., [29] as \[ZG_3(G)=\sum_{e=st\in E(G)}\vert d_{s}-d_{t}\vert. \label{eq-8}\tag{8}\]

Definition 8. Symmetric division index is proposed by V. Alexander [30] and can be stated as \[\begin{aligned} & SSD(G)=\sum_{e=st\in E(G)}\left[ \frac{X}{Y}+\frac{Y}{Z}\right], \label{eq-9} \end{aligned}\tag{9}\] where \(X= min\left[ d_{s},d_{t}\right]\) and \(Y= max\left[ d_{s},d_{t}\right].\)

Definition 9. The inverse sum index is the topological index used in [31] is stated as \[I(G)=\sum _{e=st\in E(G)}\frac{d_{s}\times d_{t}}{d_{s}+ d_{t}}. \label{eq-10}\tag{10}\]

Definition 10. Furtula et al. proposed the Augmented Zagreb index [32] and is stated as \[A(G)=\sum _{e=st\in E(G)}\left\lbrace \frac{d_{s}\times d_{t}}{d_{s}+ d_{t}-2}\right\rbrace ^{3}. \label{eq-11}\tag{11}\]

Definition 11. The modified second Zagreb index [33] is stated as \[^{m}M_{2}(G)=\sum _{e=st\in E(G)}\frac{1}{d_{s}\times d_{t}}. \label{eq-12}\tag{12}\]

3. Results and Discussion

Theorem 1. Let \(G\) denotes the graph of molecular structure of (a)\(ZINC000254565785\), then \[\begin{aligned} {2} &\chi(G)= 10.2192,\,\ GA(G)=22.533, \,\ SCI(G)=10.6573,\\ &HI(G)=9.9667, \,\ M_{1}(G)=110, \,\ M_{2}(G)=132, \\ &^{m}M_{2}(G)=4.75, \,\ IS(G)=26.567, \,\ ABC(G)=16.2396,\\ &SSD(G)=56.3333, \,\ AZI(G)=195.094, \,\ ZG_{3}(G)=12. \end{aligned}\]

Proof. The structure (a)\(ZINC000254565785\) has five different types of edges which are given below. It is obvious from the Figure 1, that the total number of vertices are 21 while edges are 23. \[\begin{aligned} {2} E_{1,2}=\left\lbrace e=st \in E(G)\vert d_{s}=1,\,\ d_{t}=2\right\rbrace,\\ E_{1,3}=\left\lbrace e=st \in E(G)\vert d_{s}=1,\,\ d_{t}=3\right\rbrace, \\ E_{2,2}=\left\lbrace e=st \in E(G)\vert d_{s}=2,\,\ d_{t}=2\right\rbrace,\\ E_{2,3}=\left\lbrace e=st \in E(G)\vert d_{s}=2,\,\ d_{t}=3\right\rbrace, \\ E_{3,3}=\left\lbrace e=st \in E(G)\vert d_{s}=3,\,\ d_{t}=3\right\rbrace, \end{aligned}\] such that \[\begin{aligned} {2} & \vert E_{1,2} \vert=1,\,\ \vert E_{1,3} \vert=2,\,\ \vert E_{2,2} \vert=7,\,\ \vert E_{2,3} \vert=7,\,\ \vert E_{3,3} \vert=6. \end{aligned}\] Thus, with the above background study and employing equations (1)(12), we obtain the required results. ◻

Similarly, we obtained the following results for other structures as depicted in Table 1 & Table 2. The 12 topological indices are plotted against logP individually. The correlation coefficient is determined for each of these cases and is shown in Figure 2.

Table 1: Various top ranked Zinc databased molecules of SARS-COV-2 with topological indices values
$$Molecules$$ $$ \chi(G)$$ $$GA(G)$$ $$SCI(G)$$ $$HI(G)$$ $$M_1(G)$$ $$M_2(G)$$
$$ZINC000254565785$$ $$10.2192$$ $$ 22.533$$ $$10.6573 $$ $$9.9667 $$ $$ 110$$ $$ 132$$
$$ZINC000726422572$$ $$12.5417 $$ $$26.2216$$ $$12.7748$$ $$12.133$$ $$ 122$$ $$ 133$$
$$ZINC000916265995$$ $$9.1134 $$ $$19.359 $$ $$9.327$$ $$8.7667 $$ $$ 94$$ $$ 108$$
$$ZINC000916356873$$ $$13.169 $$ $$28.4122 $$ $$ 13.6159$$ $$12.8667 $$ $$ 134$$ $$ 153$$
$$ZINC000806591744$$ $$ 11.387$$ $$ 25.4896$$ $$11.9995$$ $$ 11.1333$$ $$ 124$$ $$146$$
$$ZINC000178971373$$ $$ 10.8121$$ $$24.5098 $$ $$ 11.4606$$ $$ 10.5667$$ $$ 121$$ $$145$$
$$ZINC000000155607$$ $$10.2584 $$ $$22.5462 $$ $$10.7076 $$ $$10.0333 $$ $$108$$ $$125 $$
$$ZINC000016317677$$ $$14.1378 $$ $$ 30.2176$$ $$14.5493 $$ $$13.7333 $$ $$143 $$ $$161 $$
$$ZINC000193073749$$ $$ 10.1479$$ $$22.396 $$ $$10.6051 $$ $$ 9.8333$$ $$ 110$$ $$129 $$
$$ZINC000755523869$$ $$11.6479$$ $$ 25.396$$ $$12.1051$$ $$11.3333 $$ $$ 122$$ $$ 141$$
$$ZINC000763345954$$ $$9.6134 $$ $$20.359$$ $$9.827$$ $$9.627 $$ $$98 $$ $$112$$
$$ZINC000001448699$$ $$ 11.1859$$ $$24.4526$$ $$11.6297 $$ $$10.9$$ $$118 $$ $$ 138$$
$$ZINC000016940508$$ $$13.5586 $$ $$29.2621 $$ $$14.0134 $$ $$ 13.1667$$ $$140$$ $$161 $$
$$ZINC000005527649$$ $$8.298 $$ $$ 17.627$$ $$8.5105$$ $$ 8.1$$ $$82 $$ $$92 $$
$$ZINC000746495682$$ $$12.9216 $$ $$27.9866 $$ $$13.394 $$ $$12.4333$$ $$138$$ $$156$$
$$ZINC000005719506$$ $$8.7565 $$ $$18.4566 $$ $$8.947$$ $$8.467 $$ $$ 87$$ $$97 $$
$$ZINC000002149503$$ $$ 15.6867$$ $$34.4088 $$ $$16.3802$$ $$15.4$$ $$162 $$ $$185$$
Table 2: Various top ranked Zinc databased molecules of SARS-COV-2 with topological indices values
$$Molecules$$ $$^mM_2(G)$$ $$IS(G)$$ $$ABC(G)$$ $$SSD(G)$$ $$AZI(G)$$ $$ZG_3(G)$$
$$ZINC000254565785$$ $$4.75 $$ $$ 26.567$$ $$16.2396 $$ $$56.3333 $$ $$195.094$$ $$12 $$
$$ZINC000726422572$$ $$5.9444 $$ $$28.9 $$ $$ 19.489$$ $$61.3333 $$ $$200.891 $$ $$20 $$
$$ZINC000916265995$$ $$4.333$$ $$22.217 $$ $$14.349 $$ $$46$$ $$133.516$$ $$ 16$$
$$ZINC000916356873$$ $$6.167 $$ $$29.767 $$ $$ 20.6036$$ $$63.3333$$ $$232.922 $$ $$18 $$
$$ZINC000806591744$$ $$ 5.1111$$ $$ 29.9$$ $$18.4418$$ $$ 56.6666$$ $$212.313$$ $$16 $$
$$ZINC000178971373$$ $$ 4.8055$$ $$29.2 $$ $$ 17.6942$$ $$ 54.5$$ $$ 207.703$$ $$15$$
$$ZINC000000155607$$ $$4.7222$$ $$26.0167$$ $$16.292 $$ $$50$$ $$186.156$$ $$16 $$
$$ZINC000016317677$$ $$6.6389$$ $$ 34.1167$$ $$22.1676 $$ $$69.1666$$ $$240.906$$ $$23$$
$$ZINC000193073749$$ $$4.6111$$ $$26.25 $$ $$16.4299 $$ $$ 51.6666$$ $$ 183.688$$ $$16$$
$$ZINC000755523869$$ $$5.3611 $$ $$ 29.25$$ $$18.5511 $$ $$57.6666 $$ $$207.688$$ $$ 16$$
$$ZINC000763345954$$ $$4.5833 $$ $$23.2167 $$ $$15.056$$ $$48 $$ $$164.297 $$ $$16 $$
$$ZINC000001448699$$ $$ 5.1944$$ $$28.367 $$ $$17.7347 $$ $$55$$ $$204.313 $$ $$ 16$$
$$ZINC000016940508$$ $$6.3055 $$ $$33.5 $$ $$21.4486 $$ $$ 67$$ $$238.453 $$ $$18 $$
$$ZINC000005527649$$ $$3.9444 $$ $$ 19.7167$$ $$12.7969$$ $$ 39.3333$$ $$142.766$$ $$12 $$
$$ZINC000746495682$$ $$5.875$$ $$32.1833$$ $$20.971$$ $$68.4166$$ $$220.658$$ $$24 $$
$$ZINC000005719506$$ $$4.1389 $$ $$20.65 $$ $$13.6823 $$ $$38.1111 $$ $$ 144.906$$ $$13 $$
$$ZINC000002149503$$ $$7.1667$$ $$39.2 $$ $$24.8462$$ $$ 75.3333$$ $$280.922 $$ $$20$$
Table 3: Various top ranked Zinc databased molecules of SARS-COV-2 with logP
\(Molecules\) \(logP\)
\(ZINC000254565785\) \(4.074\)
\(ZINC000726422572\) \(3.644\)
\(ZINC000916265995\) \(2.624\)
\(ZINC000916356873\) \(4.249\)
\(ZINC000806591744\) \(3.756\)
\(ZINC000178971373\) \(3.817\)
\(ZINC000000155607\) \(4.564\)
\(ZINC000016317677\) \(2.95\)
\(ZINC000193073749\) \(3.647\)
\(ZINC000755523869\) \(3.437\)
\(ZINC000763345954\) \(2.211\)
\(ZINC000001448699\) \(4.226\)
\(ZINC000016940508\) \(3.349\)
\(ZINC000005527649\) \(2.806\)
\(ZINC000746495682\) \(4.05\)
\(ZINC000005719506\) \(3.981\)
\(ZINC000002149503\) \(5.481\)

Conclusion

This work has highlighted the correlation coefficient of the topological indices with respect to the partition coefficient logP for the Zinc databased molecules. It is observed from the Table 4 that, there is a positive correlation between the degree-based indices considered and logP. It is low positive correlation as the values ponder between 0.4 to 0.566 except for the third Zagreb index with logP being least positive correlation. As per the correlation values, it shows that augmented Zagreb index is more correlated with logP compared to other indices which are considered in the study. Even though the correlation coefficient obtained is less, Zinc databased molecules play a vital role in the treatment and also as a supplementation for Covid-19 patients. Also, any variant of Covid-19 risk groups and patients can be cured soon.

Table 4: Correlation coefficient of logP with topological indices
Indices Correlation coefficient(r)
$$\chi(G)$$ $$ 0.4609$$
$$GA(G)$$ $$ 0.5072$$
$$SCI(G)$$ $$ 0.4868$$
$$HI(G)$$ $$ 0.477$$
$$M_1(G)$$ $$ 0.5071$$
$$M_2(G)$$ $$ 0.527$$
$$^mM_2(G)$$ $$ 0.4121$$
$$IS(G)$$ $$ 0.5131$$
$$ABC(G)$$ $$ 0.4805$$
$$SSD(G)$$ $$ 0.4262$$
$$AZI(G)$$ $$ \textbf{0.5664}$$
$$Z_3(G)$$ $$ 0.1421$$

References

  1. Sterling, T., & Irwin, J. J. (2015). ZINC 15-ligand discovery for everyone. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 55(11), 2324-2337.

  2. Kim, S., Thiessen, P. A., Bolton, E. E., Chen, J., Fu, G., Gindulyte, A., & Bryant, S. H. (2016). PubChem substance and compound databases. Nucleic Acids Research, 44(D1), D1202-D1213.

  3. Shirdel, G. H., Rezapour, H., & Sayadi, A. M. (2013). The hyper-Zagreb index of graph operations.

  4. Furtula, B., & Gutman, I. (2015). A forgotten topological index. Journal of Mathematical Chemistry, 53(4), 1184-1190.

  5. Aslam, A., Ahmad, S., & Gao, W. (2017). On certain topological indices of boron triangular nanotubes. Zeitschrift Für Naturforschung A, 72(8), 711-716.

  6. Hofmarcher, M., Mayr, A., Rumetshofer, E., Ruch, P., Renz, P., Schimunek, J., & Klambauer, G. (2020). Large-scale ligand-based virtual screening for SARS-CoV-2 inhibitors using deep neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.00979.

  7. Hayat, S., Imran, M., & Liu, J. B. (2019). Correlation between the Estrada index and \(\pi\)-electronic energies for benzenoid hydrocarbons with applications to boron nanotubes. International Journal of Quantum Chemistry, 119(23), e26016.

  8. Randić, M. (1993). Comparative regression analysis. Regressions based on a single descriptor. Croatica Chemica Acta, 66(2), 289-312.

  9. Randic, M. (1996). Quantitative structure-property relationship. Boiling points of planar benzenoids. New Journal of Chemistry, 20(10), 1001-1009.

  10. Shanmukha, M. C., Basavarajappa, N. S., Shilpa, K. C., & Usha, A. (2020). Degree-based topological indices on anticancer drugs with QSPR analysis. Heliyon, 6(6), e04235.

  11. Shanmukha, M. C., Basavarajappa, N. S., & Anilkumar, K. N. (2020). Predicting physico-chemical properties of octane isomers using QSPR approach. Malaya Journal of Matematik, 8(01), 104-116.

  12. Hosamani, S., Perigidad, D., Jamagoud, S., Maled, Y., & Gavade, S. (2017). QSPR analysis of certain degree based topological indices. Journal of Statistics Applications & Probability, 6(2), 361-371.

  13. Zhong, J. F., Rauf, A., Naeem, M., Rahman, J., & Aslam, A. (2021). Quantitative structure-property relationships (QSPR) of valency based topological indices with Covid-19 drugs and application. Arabian Journal of Chemistry, 14(7), 103240.

  14. Ravi, V., Siddiqui, M. K., Chidambaram, N., & Desikan, K. (2022). On topological descriptors and curvilinear regression analysis of antiviral drugs used in COVID-19 treatment. Polycyclic Aromatic Compounds, 42(10), 6932-6945.

  15. Kirmani, S. A. K., Ali, P., & Azam, F. (2021). Topological indices and QSPR/QSAR analysis of some antiviral drugs being investigated for the treatment of COVID‐19 patients. International Journal of Quantum Chemistry, 121(9), e26594.

  16. Nagarajan, S., Priyadharsini, G., & Pattabiraman, K. (2023). QSPR modeling of status-based topological indices with COVID-19 drugs. Polycyclic Aromatic Compounds, 43(8), 6868-6887.

  17. Zhang, X. Y., Huang, H. J., Zhuang, D. L., Nasser, M. I., Yang, M. H., Zhu, P., & Zhao, M. Y. (2020). Biological, clinical and epidemiological features of COVID-19, SARS and MERS and AutoDock simulation of ACE2. Infectious Diseases of Poverty, 9(04), 10-20.

  18. Bhal, S. K. (2007). LogP—making sense of the value. Advanced Chemistry Development: Toronto, ON, Canada, 1-4.

  19. Ahmad, S., Siddiqui, H. M. A., Ali, A., Farahani, M. R., Imran, M., & Cangul, I. N. (2019). On Wiener index and Wiener polarity index of some polyomino chains. Journal of Discrete Mathematical Sciences and Cryptography, 22(7), 1151-1164.

  20. Chaudhry, F., Shoukat, I., Afzal, D., Park, C., Cancan, M., & Farahani, M. R. (2021). M-polynomials and degree-based topological indices of the molecule copper (I) oxide. Journal of Chemistry, 2021, 1-12.

  21. Gao, W., Siddiqui, M. K., Imran, M., Jamil, M. K., & Farahani, M. R. (2016). Forgotten topological index of chemical structure in drugs. Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal, 24(3), 258-264.

  22. Gao, W., Shi, L., & Farahani, M. R. (2017). Szeged Related Indices of TUAC6 [p, q]. Journal of Discrete Mathematical Sciences and Cryptography, 20(2), 553-563.

  23. Estrada, E., Torres, L., Rodriguez, L., & Gutman, I. (1998). An atom-bond connectivity index: modelling the enthalpy of formation of alkanes.

  24. Randic, M. (1975). Characterization of molecular branching. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 97(23), 6609-6615.

  25. Zhou, B., & Trinajstić, N. (2010). On general sum-connectivity index. Journal of Mathematical Chemistry, 47, 210-218.

  26. Vukičević, D., & Furtula, B. (2009). Topological index based on the ratios of geometrical and arithmetical means of end-vertex degrees of edges. Journal of Mathematical Chemistry, 46, 1369-1376.

  27. Gutman, I. (2013). Degree-based topological indices. Croatica Chemica Acta, 86(4), 351-361.

  28. Fajtlowicz, S. (1987). On conjectures of Graffiti-II. Congr. Numer, 60, 187-197.

  29. ASTANEH, A. A., & FATH, T. G. H. (2011). Computing the first and third Zagreb polynomials of Cartesian product of graphs.

  30. Vasilyev, A. (2014). Upper and lower bounds of symmetric division deg index.

  31. Balaban, A. T. (1982). Highly discriminating distance-based topological index. Chemical Physics Letters, 89(5), 399-404.

  32. Furtula, B., Graovac, A., & Vukičević, D. (2010). Augmented zagreb index. Journal of Mathematical Chemistry, 48, 370-380.

  33. Miličević, A., Nikolić, S., & Trinajstić, N. (2004). On reformulated Zagreb indices. Molecular Diversity, 8, 393-399.

Related Articles
Cansu Aykut Kolay1, İsmail Hakkı Mirici2
1Hacettepe University Graduate School of Educational Sciences, Ankara, Turkey.
2Hacettepe University, Faculty of Education, Ankara, Turkey.
Shatha M. AlHosian1
1College of Business Adminisrtation, King Saud University, Saudi Arabia.
Mustafa N. Mnati1, Ahmed Salih Al-Khaleefa2, Mohammed Ahmed Jubair3, Rasha Abed Hussein4
1Department of electrical engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Misan, Misan, Iraq.
2Department of Physics, Faculty of Education, University of Misan, Misan, Iraq.
3Department of Computer Technical Engineering, College of Information Technology, Imam Ja’afar Al-Sadiq University, Iraq.
4Department Of Dentistry, Almanara University for Medical Science, Iraq.
Samirah Dunakhir, Mukhammad Idrus1
1Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia.

Citation

M.C. Shanmukha, A. Usha, Mohammad Reza Farahani, Mehdi Alaeiyan, Murat Cancan. Numerical Descriptors of Top Ranked Zinc Databased Inhibitors of Sars Cov-2[J], Archives Des Sciences, Volume 74 , Issue 3, 2024. 51-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.62227/as/74309.